Skip to content

Ecce Signum

Immanentize the Empathy

  • Home
  • About Me
  • Published Works and Literary Matters
  • Indexes
  • Laboratory
  • Notebooks
  • RSS Feed

ConFusion 2018: Science Fiction and Philosophy

2018-02-12 John Winkelman

(These are my lightly edited notes for a panel I attended at the ConFusion Fantasy and Science Fiction Convention in January of 2018)

PANEL: “Science Fiction and Philosophy: Exploring the Connections”

DESCRIPTION: “SF has been called the literature of ideas, and the ideas explored in SF have become increasingly philosophical throughout the history of the genre. What are the most illuminating thought experiments in recent and classic SF? Which philosophical questions do they raise? And how are philosophers in today’s universities employing SF in their teaching and research?”

PANELISTS: Andrea Johnson, Dyrk Ashton, Ken Schrader, Nathan Rockwood

NOTES:

  • What big questions does literature tackle?
  • Everything since Hegel is a response to Hegel (or Plato)
  • Philosophy deals with things which are EXPLORED, not KNOWN.
  • Philosophy deals in questions, religion deals in answers.
  • What is “real”?
  • What will uploading minds change about how we think about how we think?
  • All of us are students of philosophy, because all of us have an ideology, even if that ideology is “I don’t have an ideology”
  • Clifford Simak’s Ogre
  • The Matrix
  • The experience of fiction is a real experience
  • Yoon-ha Lee – Ninefox Gambit
  • Ann Leckie – Ancillary Justice, et al.
  • Samuel R. Delaney – Babel-17
  • Philip K. Dick
  • Terry Pratchett
  • Mur Lafferty – Six Wakes
  • Ready Player One
  • Ferrett Steinmetz – The Uploaded
  • Ted Chiang – Lifecycle of Software Objects
  • Mass Effect (computer game)
  • Black & White (computer game)
  • Robert J. Sawyer – Quantum Night

MY THOUGHTS:

This panel was interesting in that so much of the discussion revolved around listing works which address philosophical questions, and not a lot of addressing the questions themselves. This bothered me at first, but on reflection I realize that these panels are meant to be introductions and overviews, not necessarily deep dives into the subject; if for no other reason than that the panels all stand alone, and if two or more share a subject it is only by coincidence. That said, I appreciated the breadth of suggestions, and particularly that they included games. Computer games, if the narrative is sufficiently complex, can be seen as simulations and testing grounds for ideas which are not always easy for an individual to address in the real world.

Posted in Literary MattersTagged ConFusion, ConFusion 2018, philosophy, reading, writing

Post navigation

Links and Notes for the Week of February 4, 2018
ConFusion 2018: The Setting as Character

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Personal website of
John Winkelman

John Winkelman in closeup

Archives

Categories

Posts By Month

February 2018
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728  
« Jan   Mar »

Links of Note

Reading, Writing
Tor.com
Locus Online
The Believer
File 770
IWSG

Watching, Listening
Writing Excuses Podcast
Our Opinions Are Correct
The Naropa Poetics Audio Archive

News, Politics, Economics
Naked Capitalism
Crooked Timber

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

© 2025 Ecce Signum

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: x-blog by wpthemespace.com